The Ability of ordinary Americans to protect Themselves Individually in a Constitutional Fight has been made IMPOSSIBLE. Imagine fighting this fight on say Minimum Wage.
The Hard Cold Facts regarding CONSTITUTIONAL and HUMAN RIGHTS in the US Court System is SICKENING ….. Securing them to ones INDIVIDUAL SELF is far far far beyond the Grasp of any Working American. Because of the Complexity and Ultra Expensive Legal System ( THE COURTS ) Americans are NOT Really Free and in FACT actually have very very FEW so called RIGHTS.
A Public Service Message By
SUCCINCTLY A HISTORY
The concept that human beings have inalienable rights and liberties that cannot justly be violated by others or by the state is linked to the history of democracy. It was first expressed by the philosophers of ancient Greece. Socrates, for example, chose to die rather than renounce the right to speak his mind in the search for wisdom. Somewhat later the Stoic philosophers formulated explicitly the doctrine of the rights of the individual. Traces of libertarian doctrine appear in the Bible and in the writings of the Roman statesman Marcus Cicero and the Greek essayist Plutarch. Such ideas, however, did not gain a permanent place in the political structure of the Roman Empire and all but disappeared during medieval times.
CIVIL RIGHTS – HUMAN RIGHTS
CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE UNITED STATES
WHAT WE STRIVE FOR
SOME NOTES ON FREE ACCESS TO COURTS (WORK IN PROGRESS)
COURTS ARE FREE
The Rigging and Shopping of the Courts by the ULTRA WEALTHY
Don’t panic. The ruling, issued late on Friday and only one day before the end of the law’s annual open enrollment period, is not a model of constitutional or statutory analysis. It’s instead a predictable exercise in motivated reasoning — drafted by a jurist with a history of ruling against policies and laws advanced by President Barack Obama.
The reason the judge, Reed O’Connor, gets these cases isn’t a mystery: Texas and its allied states know the game and shop these lawsuits right into Judge O’Connor’s courtroom.
Thanks to court-created judge-assignment rules, the plaintiffs were able to gain significantly more control over the judges selected to hear the cases by filing in smaller courthouses instead of major cities.
Many people assume that federal cases are assigned randomly across all judges in a district. But in reality, fifty-five of the nation’s ninety-four federal district courts are subdivided into geographic “divisions” that are used for judge assignment — essentially creating mini district courts, each with its own judges. In these districts, litigants can select the pool of judges eligible to be assigned to their cases by strategically choosing the division in which they file — a practice that this Note refers to as “divisional judge-shopping.”
Despite featuring in high-profile cases like the three filed by the state of Texas, divisional judge-shopping has drawn little attention. This Note fills the void by comprehensively surveying and reporting on the judge-assignment procedures used by the country’s ninety-four federal district courts, with an eye toward analyzing the extent to which they allow plaintiffs to engage in divisional judge- shopping. It argues that existing judge-assignment systems are insufficient to prevent divisional judge-shopping, especially in cases challenging federal and state laws, regulations, and policies. And it proposes that Congress implement standardized judge-assignment procedures in all districts to limit divisional judge-shopping opportunities.
Fancy security measures cause American money to commit suicide on the printing press.
A Whole College Course in The Subversion of the World
Money creation in the modern economy (Off the Bank of England website!)
“Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.”
Read the Bank of England produced document – the truth of the matter is extremely simple. Now the BANK OF ENGLAND HAS EXPLAINED IT. And it took one sentence to simply explain how banks create new money – by issuing loans.
The problem is a duopoly between government and the banking interests that finance government. Quibbling about which part of the duopoly is more responsible than the other is to miss the point. They both work together right now and they both, working together, broke Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act and took credit and monetary aggregate growth rate exponential to the America’s GDP growth rate and, in doing so, created the world’s greatest debt bubble – TOGETHER.
The truth is that banks and governments are legal fictions… they don’t really exist. PEOPLE do exist and PEOPLE have rigged this system so that an oligarchy benefits at the expense of the vast majority of people.
The Dismal History of Phony Money – The Daily Reckoning
Fiat Money – Investopedia
Aug 4, 2018 – Fiat money is currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but it is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material from which the money is made.
What is the difference between fiat money and representative money?
The Coming Bond Market Collapse: How to Survive the Demise of the …
Forty years later we are witnessing a collapse of that fiat currency experiment. … system and anticipating the end of the failed experiment in phony money.
The Reformation of Union State Sovereignty: The Path Back to the …
… any of its instrumentalities. Uncouples the Union State sovereign people from the phony imaginary debt created by the fiat artificial currency put into circulation …